Retention and Relationships

Did an interesting interview with the CMO Council as part of their loyalty research initiative at loyaltyleaders.org, which will show up in their report in a few months.

As with most interviews, some stuff comes out that wasn’t planned ahead of time. But what stuck with me were my comments to focus on just a few social media/marketing options vs. going after many. So I wanted to expound a bit.

Many companies are paralyzed by social media and how it relates to customer retention. Like anything else, start simple. Pick one area and start, learning more and determining how to incorporate the results into daily operations. Over time, the relationship between actions and results will become clearer, and you can make the business case for increased (or decreased) investment.

Once you master one, add another and go through the same process. It doesn’t have to be difficult. What seems to cause so much uncertainty is the proliferation of options that all appeared at once. So my guidance is to simplify, start narrow, and expand over time.

My latest article for the web channel at Multichannel Merchant.

I think my point didn’t really get across, but its mostly my fault.  The bigger point here is the separation between loyalty and value, and that customer experience is a great driver of loyalty, which in turn improves value.  Since this is part of a longer series of columns that will eventually tie together, I’ll back and rethink this one.

Good piece at Harvard Biz Publishing today, but most of the community commentary misses the point.  Offering price promotions to all customers isn’t loyalty marketing, its price promotion.  Some customers respond only to this message, but many would be just as responsive to a different message (new product intro, local event, cross-sell to a recent purchase), to great service, or to the brand as a whole.

The authors rightly point out that usually only 20% of customers are profitable.  But its not that simple, since what matters is the marginal profitability of the last dollar sold.  You have to cover those fixed costs somehow.

A different interpretation of the tactic they criticize might be:

Resources are limited, so focus on the most profitable customers.  If you have the resources to focus on unprofitable customers too, go for it, since they help cover fixed costs.  But try to allocate your overall resources based on potential for future profitability, not evenly across all customers.  Only when you are totally out of time, creativity, and employee bandwidth should you shift to pure price promotion.